—–. 1989. The Sentence structure and Semantics away from Verb Morphology within the Modern Aramaic: An excellent Jewish Dialect from Iraqi Kurdistan. American Chinese language Series, 69. The newest Haven: American Chinese language Community.
Meehan, Charles, and you will Jacqueline Alon. 1979. The fresh new Boy Whoever Tunic Stuck to Your: A good Folktale on the Jewish Neo-Aramaic Dialect out of Zakho (Iraqi Kurdistan). Israel Oriental Degree 9:174-203.
Sabar, Yona. 1976. Lel-Huza: Story and you can History inside a period of https://datingranking.net/cs/militarycupid-recenze/ Lamentations towards Ninth away from Abdominal from the Jewish Neo-Aramaic Dialect away from Zakho. JSS -62.
—–. 1988. The book out of Exodus when you look at the Neo-Aramaic on the Dialect of one’s Jewish People away from Zakho [Hebrew]. Jerusalem: Magnes Drive.
Such half dozen binyanim out of Syriac was basically reduced in NENA in order to several earliest groups, having a third closely allied for the 2nd
Thomason, Sarah Grey, and Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Code Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley and you can Los angeles: Univ. regarding Ca Push.
The initial group originated from the fresh peal, next group throughout the pael, additionally the third, whoever vocalism pursue regarding the following, comes from new afel
Other basis complicating the problem ‘s the differential affects of one’s some co-territorial languages. The new dialect differences in this Kurdish are very considerable, and to their feeling should be traced some of the version among NENA dialects. Such, the Jewish Neo-Aramaic out of Halabja, including the Kurdish of one’s area, does not separate something special and you may coming stressful, but where Kurdish maintains including a big change, thus really does Neo-Aramaic. During the Azerbaijan, Turkish has actually exerted solid effect on new Jewish dialect (Garbell 1965b), and dialects of your plain of Mosul show a robust dictate out of Arabic perhaps not seen elsewhere.
Tkhuma (Tx): What off descendants out-of emigrants from just one of the partial-independent ashirets off the southern area of Turkey, now citizen over the Khabur Area inside Syria. Data is off Jacobi (1973) and you will my personal notes.
(5) Syriac had around three first spoken stems, the fresh new peal, the pael, and the afel. These types of was in fact additional three couch potato stems, molded regarding first of them of the prefixation regarding e[Theta]-: the fresh new age[Theta]pael, the elizabeth[Theta]paal, and the ettafal. This case is obtainable while in the NENA. In most NENA dialects, verbs will stay static in new verb classes in which they certainly were included in earlier degree of one’s words. That is, the fresh new descendant regarding a Syriac peal verb was a beneficial NENA Group We verb, and you may a great Syriac pael verb would-be an effective NENA Class II verb: particularly, Urmi ptaxa ‘open’ from earlier peal, and you may sadure ‘send’ out of before pael. However, within the Jewish Azerbaijani, Halabja, and maybe Koy Sanjaq, the category registration has been reorganized and that is foreseeable with the base of your model of this new stalk instead of the historical source. Such, into the Azerbaijani the fresh C base provides the setting CaCoC- to possess sound verbs, whichever their provider, and you may CCaC- for middle-poor verbs: garosen ‘I in the morning pulling’, but kwasan ‘I (f.) was descending’ (Garbell 1965, 64).
(11) Other very high development within the NENA ‘s the 3rd person copula which have l: ile ‘he is’, ila ‘she is’. This form will get derive (Noldeke 1868, 203) out-of we[Theta] leh ‘he has’, but no copula want it is situated additional NENA. The first and you will 2nd people lack a keen l, but into the Jewish Azerbaijani, where in fact the l might have been general from the paradigm: Jilu iwIt ‘you (masc.) are’, Aradhin we:win ‘I (masc.) am’, Azerbai big’ (Garbell 1965, 64). ile is based through the NENA except in the Halabja, with -(y)e: yarxa rahamim-ye ‘it is the few days away from mercy’. None Turoyo neither Mandaic has actually forms synchronous in order to ile: Turoyo harke-yo ‘he is actually here’, harke-zero ‘I in the morning here’; Mandaic basim-ye ‘he are charming’, basim-na ‘I are charming’ (Macuch 1965, 443).
(19) The outdated Aramaic term to have ‘son’, bra from inside the BT, could have been prolonged in every NENA except Hertevin from the addition of the diminutive suffix -ona/-una: Azerbaijan Jewish brona (Garbell 1965, 297), Jilu bruna (Fox 1992, 51), Aradhin bru:na (Krotkoff 1982, 122), Tisqopa brona (Rubba, private communications), Zakho brona (Meehan and you may Alon 1979, 177). Although not, both Turoyo and you can Mandaic possess an enthusiastic epenthetic vowel, but zero suffix: Turoyo ?abro (Jastrow 1985, 221), and you may Mandaic eber otherwise ebra (Macuch 1965, 520).
b) Oftentimes, Hertevin aligns with Turoyo, against the rest of NENA. It lacks a CCaCa introduce demanding (6), has no sodir preterite (12), does not have any preposition ta (15), and you may spends ruh in order to create reflexive pronouns (14).
—–. 1965. The latest Jewish Neo-Aramaic Dialect out of Persian Azerbaijan: Linguistic Studies and you can Folkloristic Texts. Janua Linguarum, show practica 3. Brand new Hague: Mouton.
