81 Stuart J. Johnston, Microsoft Settles for Bit of Stac, Computerworld, June 27, 1994, at 30 (Microsoft paid $39.9 million for 155’o of Stac, and an additional $43 million over 43 months for a license to Stac’s data compression technology); Doug Barney, Microsoft, Stac Resolve Dispute; Microsoft In the long run Will pay Right up, InfoWorld, June 27, 1994, at 14.
83 As explained in Section V.C., infra, the superficially irrational behavior of undermining the application vendors that produce programs that run on Microsoft’s operating system is logical specifically while the Microsoft has an independent economic incentive to monopolize the s.
85 Amy Cortese, Business Week, Dec. 19, 1994, supra, at 35 (HP, Compaq and other big U.S. PC makers plan to bundle Windows 95 into their machines).
86 Look for Lawrence J. Microsoft: Not too Wonderful, Bay Area Computer Currents, Dec. 1, 1994, at 98, 101 (Ex. 1); Carole Patton, Computerworld, Nov. 14, 1994, supra, at 57 (Ex. 8).
88 Don Clark, Microsoft to purchase Intuit From inside the Inventory Treaty, Wall St. J., Oct. 14, 1994, at A3 (86% of retail store sales); Karen Epper, Application Package Shakes Upwards House Financial, Amer. Banker, Oct. 17, 1994, at 1, 25 (80-85%).
89 Michelle Flores, Wants More info, Seattle Times, Nov. 22, 1994, at B11; Michael Schrage, Microsoft Helps make 1000s of dollars; Does it Contour the management of It?, Washington Post, Oct. 21, 1994, at B3; Brent Schlender, Fortune, Jan. 16, 1995, supra, at 36.
91 Brent Schendler, Fortune, Jan. 16, 1995, supra, at 4748; find in addition to, Michael I. Miller, PC Magazine, Jan twoo discount code. 24, 1995, supra, at 80 (Ex. 25) (“Microsoft could require just a small service charge on each transaction. Or it could make money on the float — the interest in the few seconds it takes to move money from one place to another. Or both.”).
92 For example, leading industry analyst Rick Sherlund of Goldman Sachs predicted that with the settlement, Microsoft “should dominate the market for desktop software for the next 10 years.” And another leading analyst, Richard Shaffer concluded that “It]he operating system wars are over — Microsoft is the winner . Microsoft is the Standard Oil of its day.” Andrew Schulman, Microsoft’s Grip On Application Tightened up By Antitrust Deal, Dr. Dobb’s Journal of Software Tools, Oct. 1994, at 143 (Ex. 13).
93 See John M. Goodman, The fresh 2 Heavyweights Go Several other Bullet, InfoWorld, Aug. 29, 1994, at 87 (rating PC-DOS version 6.3 above MS-DOS version 6.22) and Earle Robinson, DOS-variation Madness? Consolidation Coping with Dos, Windows Sources, Oct. 1994, at 163 (“my choice would be the IBM . . . it’s cheaper”) and Yael Li-Ron, Desktop computer Dos 6.3: Dos and 2: Split up Within Birth, PC-Computing, bra computers ship with MS-DOS).
Probe out of Microsoft try Extended – Justice Dept
94 Don Clark Laurie Hays, Microsoft’s Brand new Profit Systems Mark Complaints, Wall St. J., Dec. 12, 1994, at B6 (Ex. 41).
96 All of these problems are discussed in Rory O’Connor, San Jose Mercury News, Nov. 13, 1994, supra, at 1A, 28A (Ex. 34).
Magid
99 Indeed, Microsoft’s operating system “lock-in” has permitted it to bring demonstrably inferior products to market (products that did not enjoy any appreciable consumer acceptance) without negative consequences to the company. See Michael Morris, Microsoft Package: Too little, Far too late, S.F. Examiner, July 24, 1994, at C-5. (Ex. 33)
a hundred Joseph Farrell, Hunter K. Monroe and you can Garth Saloner, The brand new Vertical Team Regarding Globe and you can Possibilities Battle As opposed to Parts Race, Oct 1994 (working papers).
101 Pick, e.grams., supra, note 32. (Microsoft presently holds greater than 90% of the X86 operating system market share); Christopher O’Malley, Personal Computing, October 1986, supra, at 181, 183 (“Microsoft’s operating system” has “better than 95 percent” share of the X86 systems.)
